The stage of developing a critical perspective where you look for patterns is the analysis stage.
<h3 /><h3>What are the stages of developing a critical perspective?</h3>
There are five essential stages derived from this theoretical approach, the first being description, where the focus is on researching and summarizing a topic. In the second stage of analysis, there is a need to look for patterns. The third stage is related to the interpretation of your findings.
The 4th stage is related to the critical evaluation of the results and the fifth corresponds to the engagement, which generates action on the individual's critical perspective.
Therefore, a critical perspective is essential for the evolution of society, as it generates greater rationalization of facts, creativity, innovation and new ideas.
Find out more about critical thinking here:
brainly.com/question/25434379
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
yes because this led him to easy going manner belied an interior toughness
The president of France is Francois Hollande
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The money multiplier is the amount of money that banks generate with each dollar of reserves which is the amount of deposits. So in A the money multiplier will be larger if banks hold on to excess reserves and it will be smaller if private citizens hold on to cash, i.e. they don´t deposit the money in the banks.
It is important to understand that the construction of identities, when analyzed in contemporary times, must be viewed from two dimensions: “Conflicting diversity within the nation-state (regions, ethnic issues, etc.) and the emergence of transnational identity references. For example, the world of consumption. Different social groups can thus appropriate globalized symbolic references (from Madonna to hip-hop) to construct their own image, their “identity”. There is, therefore, a situation within which different "identities" complement or enter into dispute. The monopoly that the state had (or thought it had) collapsed. The construction of national identity must now be done in a context of diversification that previously did not exist, technological transformations are obviously important, but one should not fall into a reductionist temptation that gives technologies a transformative capacity that they do not possess. The world will no longer be democratic because the technologies we have are more sophisticated. Today there is a certain technological panacea that often deludes us. Social problems will not be solved with 'more technology' or 'less'.
