Answer:
(A) Variable costing treats fixed overhead as a period cost.
Explanation:
Variable costing is an important concept in accounting. Under this method, manufacturing overhead is incurred in the period that a product is produced. Variable costing includes only variable manufacturing costs (direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead) in unit product costs. Moreover, it treats fixed overhead as a period cost.
Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Answer:
irrelevant
Explanation:
Under the neck idea generation model, Tracy's idea would be considered irrelevant as it low on all three measures: value, usefulness and novelty. If an idea is high on usefulness and value under this model however but low on novelty, it would have the quality of improvement as it is seen to have potential and can be improved upon.
Erik Thorvaldsson, also known as Erik the Red (ir is believed he was called like that for being a redhead), was a Norse explorer, and it is said that he founded the first settlement in Greenland. He he was born in Norway, and was the son of Thorvald Asvaldsson (hence the name Erik Thorvaldsson).
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following.
The kind of testimony their claim represents is a general statement without any evidence to prove it. It is not a claim of fact because it does not present any evidence. It is neither a claim of policy. We could say that it could be a claim of value, but it doesn't say if this is good or bad.
So it is important to include some type of evidence to back our affirmations. Without the proper evidence, then it is their opinions against ours.
So it is hard to believe that hunters Harlen E. Ford and Billy Mills have seen Bigfoot at one time if they don't provide proper evidence.
