Holocauset cause by the germans trying to eradicate the jews in the 1940's during the secound world war
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that this is an example of a positivistic explanation of criminal behaviour. Positivistic explanations focus on the connection between criminal behaviour and external factors. These theories argue that criminal behaviour is often due to social, political or economic circumstances that put pressure on a person and encourage him or her to act in a deviant way. Sam would be a good example of this theory, as he encountered many problems in his life that might have encouraged him to act in a criminal way.
Here is a site for what you are looking for
Reform in Britain 1870-1914 - History Homewww.historyhome.co.uk/peel/politics/reform.htm<span>These notes examine the major reforms introduced into the UK during the period 1870 to 1914. ...During the 19th century Britain's government was the model most Liberals ... In 1903 the Women'sSocial and Political Union was founded by Emmeline ... up to the age of 10 (raised to 12 in 1899) and in 1891 it was made free.</span>
Answer:
The killing of the sow represents the boys' loss of innocence in the land and their desperation without a mother figure.
Explanation:
William Golding's <em>Lord of the Flies</em><em> </em>is a story about a group of young boys stranded on an island after their plane crashed. Their life on the island and their gradual loss of order and civilization is shown in the story.
Chapter 8: Gift for the Darkness reveals the boys' killing of the sow and the piglets. Under the leadership of Jack, the group of boys killed the pigs and put her head on a stick. This act of beheading the sow is representative of the group's loss of innocence in being motherless in a deserted land. The sow's death is the missing mother figure in the young boys' lives. The sow and her young piglets are representative of the innocence of nature. And when they are murdered, the innocence was lost.
It's not one 1 2 3 4 5 because Talmadge was against the new deal, so your answer is 6 and 7 because he was opposed of the new deal, and he was a governor.
