Answer:
No, I do not agree with them. Both are wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
For a shape or figure to be considered a scaled copy of another, the length of all the segments of scaled copy must be equal to the length of all corresponding segments of the original figure multiplied by the same scale factor.
By examining the scaled copies B, C, and D, we would conclude that only D can be referred to as a scaled copy of D, because all the segments are exactly twice the corresponding segments of A. C and B do not have all its segment scaled in the same proportion.
Therefore, we cannot agree with Priya, nor Tyler. They are both wrong.
Looks like 75%. Not sure what they're talking about for the reduce part.
Rule: If x-k is a factor of p(x), then p(k) = 0. This is a special case of the remainder theorem.
Using that rule, we can see that x+5 is really x-(-5) so k = -5.
Therefore,
p(k) = 0
p(-5) = 0
so the answer is choice D.
12+25+45+65+34
= 181
Must click thanks and mark brainliest
