All categories

2 years ago

I need help please! How do i know which is the correct answer.

Mathematics

1 answer:

hichkok12 [17]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

since there cant be technically half of someone (i hope not) the domain has to be "whole numbers". hours can be split, so they are "all numbers". well, looking at it again, it is C, since the others can not possibly be correct.

You might be interested in

F(x) = 3x, g(x) = 1/3f(x). Find g(0)

schepotkina [342]

Answer:

f(1/3)=3 try that its probably right

4 0

2 years ago

Y = (x)^(1/9)*Find f(x) when x=(1/2)Round your answer to the nearest thousandth.

Verizon [17]

We are given a function f ( x ) defined as follows:

$y=f(x)=x^{\frac{1}{9}}$

We are to determine the value of f ( x ) when,

$\times\text{ = }\frac{1}{2}$

In such cases, we plug in/substitue the given value of x into the expressed function f ( x ) as follows:

$y\text{ = f ( }\frac{1}{2}\text{ ) = (}\frac{1}{2})^{\frac{1}{9}}$

We will apply the power on both numerator and denominator as follows:

$f(\frac{1}{2})=\frac{1^{\frac{1}{9}}}{2^{\frac{1}{9}}}\text{ = }\frac{1}{2^{\frac{1}{9}}}$

Now we evaluate ( 2 ) raised to the power of ( 1 / 9 ).

$f\text{ ( }\frac{1}{2}\text{ ) = }\frac{1}{1.08005}$

Next apply the division operation as follows:

$f\text{ ( }\frac{1}{2})\text{ = }0.92587$

Once, we have evaluated the answer in decimal form ( 5 decimal places ). We will round off the answer to nearest thousandths.

Rounding off to nearest thousandth means we consider the thousandth decimal place ( 3rd ). Then we have the choice of either truncating the decimal places ( 4th and onwards ). The truncation only occurs when (4th decimal place) is < 5.

However, since the (4th decimal place) = 8 > 5. Then we add ( 1 ) to the 3rd decimal place and truncate the rest of the decimal places i.e ( 4th and onwards ).

The answer to f ( 1 / 2 ) to the nearest thousandth would be:

$\textcolor{#FF7968}{f}\text{\textcolor{#FF7968}{ ( }}\textcolor{#FF7968}{\frac{1}{2})}\text{\textcolor{#FF7968}{ = 0.926}}$

6 0

7 months ago

What is the estimate of 19.7-6.9

Zolol [24]

Always to do each to 1 sigfig 20-6=14

5 0

3 years ago

Please answer this correctly

sineoko [7]

Answer:

Chicken: 36%

Beef: 34%

Black Bean: 30%

<em>Hope this helps!</em>

8 0

2 years ago

A doctor released the results of clinical trials for a vaccine to prevent a particular disease. In these clinical trials, 200,0

CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

1) No, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the vaccine was effective (P-value=0.104) .

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2< 0$

being the subindex 1 for the experimental group and subindex 2 for the control group.

2) Test statistic z=-1.26

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that the vaccine was effective.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2< 0$

The significance level is 0.01.

The sample 1 (experimental group), of size n1=100000 has a proportion of p1=0.0002.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=21/100000=0.0002$

The sample 2 (control group), of size n2=100000 has a proportion of p2=0.0003.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=30/100000=0.0003$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.0001.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.0002-0.0003=-0.0001$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{21+30}{100000+100000}=\dfrac{51}{200000}=0.00026$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.00026*0.99974}{100000}+\dfrac{0.00026*0.99974}{100000}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0+0.0000000025}=\sqrt{0.0000000051}=0.000071$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.00009-0}{0.000071}=\dfrac{-0.00009}{0.000071}=-1.26$

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=P(z$

As the P-value (0.104) is bigger than the significance level (0.01), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the vaccine was effective.

6 0

2 years ago