This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following?
When the influence of the situation is _______, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of _______.
Select one:
a. weak; individual personalities
b. weak; external circumstances
c. strong; internal forces
d. strong; dispositions
Answer:
The correct option is letter A. When the influence of the situation is weak, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of individual personalities.
Explanation:
Since behavior is a product of a situation combined with the person, it is fair to think that the result may be accounted for differently according to how strong each element is. Thus, if a situation and the "sub-elements" it includes - such as the presence of others, cultural and social influences, and so on - are weak, it is only logic to assume that the element "person" will be predominant. The result behavior is, therefore, more likely to be a consequence of that individual's personality.
I believe the answer is: <span>artists, engineers, politicians, and security guards
The artist would be involved in creating the aesthetic design for the gates, engineers would be involved in creating functional design for the gates, politicians would be involved in gaining permission to build the gates and security guards would be involved to overseer the building process.</span>
Answer:
it would be the middel right
Explanation:
because even though they broke away they were still there and were still named israel
<span>A memo from the deputy directors to the Airport Board is an example of an upward organizational message.
An upward organizational flow or message is where the information goings from the bottom to the top. In this case, the message is going from the deputy directors to the Airport Board. The Airport Board is "above" the deputy directors in terms of authority and ranking within the organization so the message is traveling upward.</span>
