9514 1404 393
Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
A graphing calculator can do a nice job of showing you what the graph looks like.
The initial factor of 4 is the value when x=0, the y-intercept. The base of 2 tells you the function value is multiplied by 2 for each unit of x to the right, and divided by 2 for each unit of x to the left. (The curve quickly goes off the top of the graph.)
The horizontal asymptote is y=0, as it is for all exponential functions (that have not been translated).
Answer:
192
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer to the question is;
Yes, it is very significant as the number of of observed vaccinated children is below the number of actually vaccinated children by 78.
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the survey of more than 13,000 children indicate that only 89.4 % had actually been and the P-value indicate that the chance of having a sample proportion of 89.4 % vaccinated is 1.1 %.
P is low at 0.011 for which however the proportion of those vaccinated is between 0.889 and 0.899 using a 95% confidence interval, whereby the decrease from 90 % believed to 89.9 % is small, albeit it depends on the size of the population.
At 89.4 %, in a sample of 13,000, the number of children expected to have been vaccinated but were missed is equal to 90 - 89.4 = 0.6 % = 0.006
Therefore the children missed = 78 children which is significant.
The correct answer is shown in attached figure
To find the correct graph, we should study the continuity of the function
Check the continuity at x = -2
from the left ⇒⇒ f(-2) = 1/2 * -2 + 3 = 2
from the right ⇒⇒ f(-2) = 2
∴ The function is continuous at x = -2
Check the continuity at x = 3
from the left ⇒⇒ f(3) = 2
from the right ⇒⇒ f(3) = 2*3 - 3 = 3
∴ The function is jump discontinuous at x = 3
From the previous results the correct graph is the last as shown in attached graph.
