Answer:
naturalistic observation.
Explanation:
Cal believes that a larger percentage of a city’s population will engage in public displays of affection in highly populated cities due to feelings of anonymity when an individual is among a lot of other people. He rides a bus in densely populated New York City for five hours straight, watches the bus riders’ interactions with each other, and unobtrusively counts the number of couples who are holding hands, hugging, or kissing. He then does the same in the sparsely populated city of Rock Falls, Iowa. The research method Cal used is known as naturalistic observation.
As we know that Naturalistic observation is a research method which is used commonly by psychologists and other social scientists. in this technique, it involves observing subjects in their natural environment.
<span>The word "critical" is an ideal adjective of judgement or opinion as it incorporates both. One can have critical judgement or opinion. "She was extremely critical of his attempts to produce a meaningful script." This statement is both judgemental and opinion based as it is her opinion that the script was not meaningful.</span>
The answer to this depends on what sources you are using, but some sources state that people identify lies only 55% of the time!
That's very little, considering that 50% is the chance level - this number would be the one used if we could never really use our intuition to guess correctly. For example if we guessed that every second person randomly lies that would give us the "chance level" of 50 %. (if exactly half of the people lied).
And in real life, we can tell 55% of the time if people are lying - this means we are slightly better than chance.
We can conclude from this that we should never trust our intuition about whether people lie or not!
Answer:
the effect of framing,
Explanation:
The effect of framing refers to some types of bias that occurred when people tried to pick their options while already believing that only specific type of options would be beneficial.
In the example above, Pablo has several options to turn the screw.
But he already had a pre-existing belief that only screwdriver would be the options that only beneficial for him. So, he chose to ignore the potential use of coins even if it also could solve his problem.
