Answer:
The value of n is -6
Step-by-step explanation:
- If the function f(x) is translated k units up, then its image is g(x) = f(x) + k
- If the function f(x) is translated k units down, then its image is g(x) = f(x) - k
- The vertex form of the quadratic function is f(x) = a(x - h)² + k, where a is the coefficient of x² and (h, k) is the vertex
∵ k(x) = x²
→ Its graph is a parabola with vertex (0, 0)
∴ The vertex of the prabola which represents it is (0, 0)
∵ The given graph is the graph of p(x)
∵ Its vertex is (0, -6)
∴ h = 0 and k = -6
∵ a = 1
→ Substitute them in the form above
∴ p(x) = 1(x - 0)² + -6
∴ p(x) = x² - 6
→ Substitute x² by k(x)
∴ p(x) = k(x) - 6
∵ p(x) = k(x) + n
→ By comparing the two right sides
∴ n = -6
∴ The value of n is -6
Look at the attached figure for more understanding
The red parabola represents k(x)
The blue parabola represents p(x)
Answer:
1- 4x -7 =29, x= 9
2-x/3 - 8 = 12, x=60
Step-by-step explanation:
4x-7 =29
4x= 29 +7
4x= 36
x= 9
x/3 -8 =12
x/3 = 12+ 8
x/3 = 20
x= 20(3)
x= 60
Answer:
Ok:
Step-by-step explanation:
I see that you set up 90 miles = 60 mph * t, where you found out that t = 1.5. What what you needed to do was set 180 miles = 45 mph * t. This is because it is 45 mph for the <em>whole</em> trip. Then, you find that t = 4 hours. That that means that he spent 2.5 hours driving back. Then, we can do d=vt and find 90/2.5 as the speed he went home at. Which comes out to be 36 mph.
He had saved 320 initially
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the amount he saved be 'a'
Amount spent = 20 + 40 + 30
= 90
His grand father gave 50
At the end he has 280
280 = a - 90 +50
a = 280 -50 +90
= 320
He had saved 320 initially
Answer: If the corresponding angles of two triangles are not congruent, then the triangles are not congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the corresponding angles of two triangles are not congruent, then the triangles are not congruent.
A contrapositive statement is when you take the original statement, "flip" it around, and write the opposite of the original statement. Here's an example:
<u>Original statement:</u> The grass is wet because it was raining.
<u>Contrapositive statement:</u> It was not raining, so the grass is not wet.
Notice how we "flipped" the original sentence around, as wrote it's "opposite".
