Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
Answer:
b. that they agreed to purchase.
Explanation:
A minor is a person who is under the age of 18 and unable to make decision on his own such as mentally impaired or incompetent persons .
A minor cannot enter a contract like adults but if under any circumstance they enter into a contract of sale purchase of daily goods like clothing etc, they are liable to pay the price which they agreed to pay.
Their parents are liable only if the contract was made according to the parent's will etc.
If the minor is unable to pay the agreed amount then the minor should return the goods or fulfill any other liability as imposed by the court of law.
Answer:
transaction processing system
Answer:
Company 1 = $2 per share
Company 2 = $2.50 per share
Explanation:
Given that,
EBIT for both companies = $1,000
Number of shares outstanding for company 1 = 500
Number of shares outstanding for company 2 = 300
Interest paid by company 2 = $250
EPS for company 1:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $0) ÷ 500
= $2 per share
EPS for company 2:
= (Total income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Shares outstanding
= ($1,000 - $250) ÷ 300
= $750 ÷ 300
= $2.50 per share
