Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction. It can occur within seconds or minutes of exposure to something you're allergic to, such as peanuts or bee stings.
Answer:
They should think of an alternative explanation for their results.
Explanation:
The next step that the scientists should take is to interpret why their hypothesis went wrong. The researchers should look for patterns in their observations and provide an alternative explanation for the results which occurred. Based on the results and their understandings, they should further make another hypothesis and check for its authenticity.
In scientific researches, the results of a hypothesis generally do not get the expected results but this leads to new findings and discoveries.
Given what we know, we can confirm that the aspect of nucleic acids and transcription that can help explain this discrepancy is that of alternative splicing.
<h3>Alternative Splicing.</h3>
- This process allowed the cells to use a single gene for the creation of various proteins.
- This process includes the separation of RNA at splicing sites to create new versions of the mRNA strand.
- This helps to increase the diversity of mRNA's available and create more proteins.
Therefore, given that alternative splicing allows the cells to create multiple forms of distinct proteins from a single gene, this allowed our organisms to develop the vast number of proteins we use, without the need for a much larger genome.
To learn more about genome visit:
brainly.com/question/20215717?referrer=searchResults
Whether or not the article describes persenal experience is the major determining factor in this question. If the article tells the story of another, it is secondary, if the article was written by someone who is recounting on their experience, it is first peron. Hope this is clear and understandable.
