You "distributed" the negation inside the parenthesis. Let's focus on the 
part.
We can distribute the negation inside the parenthesis by negating every term, and switching and with or, and vice versa. So, you have
Of course, writing 
is improper, I was just stressing the fact that we distributed the negation to every term in the parenthesis. So, since a double negation cancels out, you're left with
which of course implies that
Edit: I actually derived the expression in the opposite order, but since they are equivalent, it doesn't really matters where you start from and where you get to. Anyway, if you actually want to derive 
from 
, you simply have to negate the first parenthesis and distribute the negation as discussed.
Answer:
$13,695.98
Step-by-step explanation:
Continuously compounded interest formula:
where
A = future value
P = principal (present value of amount invested)
e = mathematical constant, the base of natural logarithms
r = interest rate
t = time in years
We have: P = 6154; r = 8% = 0.08; t = 10
Answer: $13,695.98
Step-by-step explanation:
2A=h(a+b)
2A=ha+hb
2A-hb=ha
2A-hb/h=a
The answer is d because the line is cutting thru the x axis on 1/3 and then the line cuts thru the y axis on -2 so the answer would be 1/3x-2
