Answer:
Explanation:
Base on my understanding of your question, it seems you are comparing susceptibility of disruption of ecosystems with fewer organizations to that of numerous organizations.
Let start from the definition of an ecosystem which can be defined as community of living organisms such plants, animals and non living organisms components in the same environment cohabiting to form a system and are linked together through nutrients and energy cycles. In other word, we can say no organisms exist in isolation and as such they are depend on each others. We also have different type of organisms in an ecosystem which are character as consumer; those that predate on others for their surviver which are known as heterotroph, while some are capable of producing their own food and are termed autotroph either through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis. Some organismsalso feeds on dead things and they are termed Scavengers or detritivores.
So, going by these explanations, ecosystem with few organizations will be more susceptible to disruption because some organisms will go into extinction as they are being eaten up by heterotroph organism and as such themselves will not survived as their will no food for them to feed on again. As such, the cycle will not complete leading to break in nutrients and energy cycles and eventually the ecosystem will be disrupted. While those with many organizations, the cycles continued as the food chain continues and the ecosystem continue to exist.
It is heat, convection cells in the asthenosphere cause the movement of the crust.
Answer: This answer is for all the questions: Chargaff's rules state that DNA from any species of any organism should have a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of purine and pyrimidine bases (i.e., A+G=T+C) and, more specifically, that the amount of guanine should be equal to cytosine and the amount of adenine should be equal to thymine.
Explanation:
Answer:
????
Explanation:
None of those seem to be correct to me.
1. Observations are made using the five senses- sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell. So this is invalid.
2. Observations and experiments can both be done anywhere
3. See answer to 2
4. It's cut off? But observations can literally be as simple as looking at a stick and noting that it's brown, so from what I can read, it's invalid.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. birds have beaks adapted to break open hard shells." The adaptation would most likely be found in organisms living in the rainforest is that <span>birds have beaks adapted to break open hard shells</span>
