Answer:
B : 732.54
Explanation:
1. 4.65% over 100% times with 699.99 = 32.55
2. plus 32.55 with 699.99
Answer:
If linen department is dropped operating income of the company will decrease.
Explanation:
That is because the cotrollable margin of the department is positive:
controllable margin = contribution margin - controllable fixed costs
$605,000-($800,000-380,000) = 185,000
That means that the Linen department helps to reduced fixed cost that are not generated by this department and that will keep existing wether the department is closed or not.
In addittion the Hardware department will loose 19% of its sales if the Linen department is closed. Thus will result in a reduction of the cntribution margin of the hardware deparment too.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Profit maximization.
Explanation:
Top executives are in charge of decision-making in companies. The path the firm will take depends on them. Their ultimate goal is always to maximize the profits of a firm. For such a thing to happen several accounting and operations analysis is conducted to make adjustments on production or engage in the manufacturing of new goods.
An ethical dilemma arises when <em>profit maximization</em> implies affecting others through pollution or the manufacturing of products that could be somehow risky. Managers in most cases would prefer to cut the costs of production but they must find a balance between generating more revenue and fulfilling the minimum quality requirements so that the goods or the production of them does not put others at risk.
The answer to this question is <span>the iron law of oligarchy
In </span><span>the iron law of oligarchy, the elites that had a huge amount of wealth in a certain area will always spread their influence among the political environment. So, even though the political system has a democratic front, it would never achieve true democracy because in the end the will of the oligrach will tend to win.</span>
Throwing the copies out in the garage can without
shredding because he’s tired shows Raj did not follow the company’s HIPAA
P&Ps about proper disposal of PHI. He could have locked those copies for
later "proper" disposal. Therefore, Yes! Raj has violated company
policy and HIPAA.