Answer:
Thanks for your points.......
Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
Answer:
The correct answers are: 1- Explicit racism. 2- Implicit racism.
Explanation:
prejudiced towards people of a certain race.
It is a conscious act of acknowledgment of racists beliefs, attitudes, and opinions. An explicitly racist person is aware of his/her racism and can rationalize it.
Implicit racism is unconscious and it includes unconscious biases, tendencies and expecting certain behaviors from particulars just because they are from a certain race.
Thus, Explicit racism is reflected in a persons conscious and openly shared attitude, and implicit racism refers to attitudes that exist on a deeper level.
I’m pretty sure it’s grapes
I believe the answer is: feedback
In communication context, feedback refers to the reply that people give after they receive and decipher a certain message. Feedback could be both positive and negative. What liz experienced above is not what she expected, and would be considered as a negative feedback from the father.
