Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
Answer:
C is the correct answer to this question.
Answer:
Section 5 of the FTC Act
Explanation:
Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibited companies to make "deceptive actions" during all activities in a commerce.
In marketing, this section of the Act prevented companies to falsely promoting their products. They're required to truthfully listed all ingredients of the product and banned from making claim that are misleading to the consumers.
For example, you can't claim a drug that you sell can cure cancer without proper authorized researches to back it up.
The process is a multiplicative inverse of which people seem to check
Answer:
C
Explanation:
one it makes sense & it fits in the context of the sentence
