Answer:
Pluralist Theory is a theory which states that a mass of groups can bring change or impact policies of the USA, instead of only one party or group. The second citizen is saying exactly that, he claims that many different perspectives of competing groups will bring about only policies acceptable to a consensus of the citizenry. So, we can conclude from his beliefs that the second citizen believes in the political theory of <u>Pluralist Theory.</u>
Answer:
"good faith" exception
Explanation:
"good faith" exception -
It refers to as the legal doctrine where there is exemption to the exclusionary rule .
It is also known as good-faith doctrine .
The exclusionary rule -
It is a legal rule , which helps to avoid any collected evidence or the analysis of the violation in the court of law .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is "good faith" exception .
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
It should be elapsed.
I think it’s elapsed because if something is elapsed, it means that it is the amount of time that something takes or is.
You write a thesis question, review to become familiar with earlier research, and <span>form a hypothesis.</span>
Answer:
The electoral college was intended to be a balance between popular voting and representatives in Congress who already had legislative power.
Explanation:
The electoral college was a compromise on different systems for voting for the executive branch because they did not want just Congress to be the source of the votes because that could lead to corruption and Congress already had legislative power. There were others who did not want to let the people elect the president by a popular vote because this would leave many states with smaller populations underrepresented. At the time it was thought that the common person in the 18th-century lacked the know-how to be fully informed about politics and what the candidates were each promoting, especially in rural areas. Second, the founding fathers feared that direct or popular voters would appeal just to daily needs and thus steer the country astray. There was also concern that a populist president with such a direct tie to the people would be dangerously powerful.
