Answer:
A. 6.75%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the Rate formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $1,021.16
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 7% ÷ 2 = $35
NPER = 13 years × 2 = 26 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER,PMT,-PV,FV,type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the pretax cost of debt is 6.75% (3.38% × 2)
Answer:
Total materials variance = (Actual quantity * Actual price) - (Standard quantity * Standard price)
= 2,850 - (230 * 14.4)
= 462 (Favourable)
Materials price variance = (Standard price - Actual price) * Actual quantity
= [1.8 - (2,850/1,500)] * 1,500
= 150 Unfavourable
Materials quantity variance = (Standard quantity - Actual quantity) * Standard price
= [(230 * 8) - 1,500] * 1.8
= 612 Favourable
Total labour variance = (Actual hours * Actual rate) - (Standard hours * Standard rate)
= 19,458 - (230 * 84)
= 138 Unfavourable
Labour price variance = (Standard rate - Actual rate) * Actual hours
= [14 - (19,458/1,410)] * 1,410
= 282 Favourable
Labour quantity variance = (Standard hours - Actual hours) * Standard rate
= [(230 * 6) - 1,410] * 14
= 420 Unfavourable
Answer:
$54,000
Explanation:
Eliza's share of net income = $40,000 ÷ 2
= $20,000
Eliza made withdrawals = $21,000
Eliza capital = $55,000
Eliza’s capital account balance at the end of the year:
= Eliza capital - Eliza withdrawals + Net income share of Eliza
= $55,000 - $21,000 + $20,000
= $54,000
Therefore, the Eliza’s capital account balance at the end of the year is $54,000.
If the new hires had not been adequately trained to make use of the system. This is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
<h3>What is fundamental attribution bias?</h3>
Fundamental attribution bias can be defined as the way in which a person judge another person without considering the situation factors.
Based on the giveing scenario Paulina is using fundamental attribution bias on the new employ by ignoring the reason why the new hire did not use the company's expert software system.
Therefore this is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
Learn more about fundamental attribution bias here:brainly.com/question/17109470
Answer:
D the demand for tarot card readers has increased.
Explanation:
At constant supply, price of goods or services tend to increase as demand increases. In this case, the demand for the services has increased, meaning that demand for tarot card reading has increased relative to the supply of the service. This has resulted in an increase in price of the service.
