Answer:b. agenda setting
Explanation:
Media takes action when there are major new that are taking place throughout the world and people always need to know what is happening through media
It can be the President of the United States announcing what has happened in a particular region or state anything that affect the people they need to be provided with facts in order to grasp what is actual happening around them.
Something may be missed or ignore which is why agenda setting is crucial.
Agenda setting focuses on crucial issues to concentrate on for the public news,it deals with delivering what is relevant to people
The agenda setting theory is based two assumptions.
- The first one is that the media may adjust the news rather than reporting real news
- The second one is that the issue overemphasized by the media may seem more vital than it is
Types of Agenda Setting
There are three types of agenda setting:
- There is public agenda setting which focuses on crucial issues to be reported decided by the public.
- Media agenda setting defines viatal stories that need to be covered defined by the media
- Policy agenda setting is defined by both the public and the media which impact public policy makers
<span>In her holocaust memorial, Rachel Whiteread depicted the shapes of identical books as a (reference to the Jews as "the people of the book".)</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
I think you forgot the options, but i can give you some information that might be useful: the two are independent, but still, the federal courts can decide whether the state courts took their decisions according to the constitution.