Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Algorithm for finding the new optimal flux: 1. Let E' be the edges eh E for which f(e)>O, and let G = (V,E). Find in Gi a path Pi from s to u and a path , from v to t.
2) [Special case: If , and have some edge e in common, then Piu[(u,v)}uPx has a directed cycle containing (u,v). In this instance, the flow along this cycle can be reduced by a single unit without any need to change the size of the overall flow. Return the resulting flow.]
3) Reduce flow by one unit along
4) Run Ford-Fulkerson with this sterling flow.
Justification and running time: Say the original flow has see F. Lees ignore the special case (4 After step (3) Of the elgorithuk we have a legal flaw that satisfies the new capacity constraint and has see F-1. Step (4). FOrd-Fueerson, then gives us the optimal flow under the new cePacie co mint. However. we know this flow is at most F, end thus Ford-Fulkerson runs for just one iteration. Since each of the steps is linear, the total running time is linear, that is, O(lVl + lEl).
Answer:
169.1 unit^2 to the nearest tenth.
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of the parallelogram = base * height
= 24 * 6 unit^2.
Area of the semicircle = 1/2 pi r^2.
Here r = 1/2 * 8 = 4.
So the area is 1/2 * pi * 4^2
= 8pi unit^2.
The area of the whole figure = 24*6 + 8pi
= 169.13 unit^2.
P = 2(l+w)
substitute in the knowns
90 = 2(27+w)
divide by 2
90/2 = 2/2 *(27+w)
45 = 27+w
subtract 27 from each side
18=w
w = 18ft
Answer:
The values of y would be -9 and 15
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
the formula to calculate the distance between two points is equal to
we have
S(-2,3) and T(3,y)
substitute the given values in the formula and solve for y
squared both sides
take square root both sides
therefore
The values of y would be -9 and 15
You could do cross multiplication, which works for every problem. Or you could just multiply 15 by 2. The first way is more reliable.
3x = 15*6
3x = 90
x = 30