After Mexico's defeat on the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo came into action. The U.S. was recquired to pay 15 million dollars as compensation for damages, while taking ownership of the territories of California, half of New Mexico, most of Arizona, Nevada, Utah and parts of Wyoming and Colorado.
Mexicans that were settled in these territories, had the choice to relocate within the new limits of their country, or stay and receive American citizenship with full civil rights. This had quite big implications in U.S. culture as it became more racially diverse. In the following censuses between 1850 and 1920 most annexed mexicans were counted as "white", but in reality, segregation only grew with time and continues to do so until this day, with mexican-native americans being considered foreigners almost universally. At the same time, mexican migration to these areas also continued to rise over the years, making the contrast bigger.
Politically, we can say Mexico wasn't in a bad position in terms of their negotiation power. The U.S. had shown itself hesitant to annex Mexico's territories and having deep domestic divisions in regards to the aims and justification for the expansion. However, the military power of the U.S. overshadowed all of that and their victory was definite. The treaty established a pattern of political inequality between the two countries, and this lopsided relationship has stalked Mexican-U.S. relations ever since.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte had no social expression and was not admired by the French.
Explanation:
Supported by the bourgeoisie, politicians and the army, Napoleon was responsible for delivering the 18 Brumaire coup, after which established his leadership and secured the bourgeoisie in power. Bonaparte was also seen as the savior in his homeland of France. Napoleon Bonaparte contrary to believe was admired in his homeland of France. he as also faced strong opposition from Jacobins and monarchists who at that time didn’t believe in his philosophy.
Lincoln's proposal called for the liberation of slaves, but it also gave former Confederate governments latitude to impose temporary restrictions on the rights of freedmen.
President Lincoln put up a reconstruction plan in December that would have allowed the Confederate states to form new state governments following the taking of allegiance vows by 10% of their male population and the states' recognition of the long-term liberation of former slaves.
Lincoln's proposal was criticised by the Radical Republicans because they felt it was too forgiving of the South. Radical Republicans thought Lincoln's Reconstruction plan was too lenient because, in their eyes, the South had started the war and should be punished accordingly.
To learn more about Reconstruction Plan refer to:
brainly.com/question/19246090
#SPJ1