Photojournalist or a smoke jumper?
Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
Answer:
Demand drops to zero
Explanation:
Infinite elasticity of demand is also called perfect elasticity of demand.
In this scenario the demand for a product is attached to it's price.
There is an infinite change in the quantity demanded as a result of change in price.
Graphically it is a horizontal demand curve as represented in the attached
Even a small increase in price will cause demand to fall to zero.
Examples are luxury goods such as high end cars and expensive jewelry.
C. Company cite :)
Please award me the best answer :)
Answer:
The economy of Cuba is a largely planned economy dominated by state-run enterprises.The country's economy had grown rapidly in the early part of the century, However, from 1996, the State started to impose income taxes on self-employed Cubans.
Explanation:
