Answer:
Dear pupils of the future ,
I am writing this letter to know the new ways and tactics you use to learn and how it better your studying skills
Right now in my times for studying the latest way to study is by using electronics like phone ,tablets and computers. In this moments I feel very good and i like the way studies are improving .
I included some electronics like the phones and computers because those are the best ways to study right now ,for example ,the computers help u get far more information than on phones and on tablets ,on phones you get better study skills and on tablets you can play brain games alot.
My best wish for you pupils of the future is that ,you people get an eccelent school day and get better objects or electronics for studying
Explanation:
Answer:
I think abiding.
Explanation:
I don't know why. It is just a guess
The conflict in "Little Brother" is external and is characterized by the man versus society type.
<h3>What is conflict in a story?</h3>
- It is a disharmonious situation between the character and some elements.
- It is a combat between the protagonist and another element.
The external conflict takes place outside the protagonist's mind, that is, it is combat, a disharmonious situation between the character and an element present in the outside world. This element could be another character, a group of characters, or even an element of nature.
In the case of "Little Brother," the conflict occurs when the Department of Homeland Security accuses the protagonist of carrying out a terrorist attack in the city. As the Department of Homeland Security is formed by a group of people, we can say that this conflict is a man versus society type.
Learn more about literary conflicts at the link:
brainly.com/question/11405642
#SPJ1
Answer:
For the past few years, I’ve traveled the globe talking with male executives about how to close the gender gap. In the wake of the #MeToo movement, men who never considered sexism to be “their” issue were suddenly eager to become male allies, to help solve the problem.
As businesses grapple with the institutional racism built in to so many of our structures, history gives us some clues – and some warnings about what we may get wrong, yet again.
Consider what’s happened in the wake of the #MeToo movement. It’s been almost three years since it became a global rallying cry, sparked by revelations about Harvey Weinstein and others. It broadened attention not just on sexual assault, but on the everyday indignities that women face: being marginalized, overlooked, and underpaid. There were plenty of firings then too, and plenty of talk from executives and politicians. But actual impact? Not so much.
Explanation:
