Answer:
John Glover Roberts Jr, an American lawyer is the current Chief Justice of the United States.
Explanation:
John Glover Roberts was initially nominated to be an associate justice but when the Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist (the Chief justice at that time) died on September 3, 2005, the president of the United States of America, George W. Bush, announced the nomination of Roberts to the position of Chief Justice in the same month of September. The senate of the United States of America granted the request of President Bush and Roberts appointment took effect.
Answer:
Absolutely. The answer is true.
Explanation:
Any time you transport clients you want to ensure that nothing happens from point "A" to point "B". As a result, if the vehicle suddenly becomes inoperable it places an unnecessary risk factor and vulnerability on the client's well-being. The logic here, always have a vehicle that is reliable and has been serviced routinely.
Answer:
The accounting equation is a basic principle of accounting and a fundamental element of the balance sheet. The equation is as follows:
Assets = Liabilities + Shareholder’s Equity
This equation sets the foundation of double-entry accounting and highlights the structure of the balance sheet. Double-entry accounting is a system where every transaction affects both sides of the accounting equation. For every change to an asset account, there must be an equal change to a related liability or shareholder’s equity account. It is important to keep the accounting equation in mind when performing journal entries.
The balance sheet is broken down into three major sections and their various underlying items: Assets, Liabilities, and Shareholder’s Equity.
Answer
The court would most likely rule in Eiln's favor
Explanation:
Even though its up to each court to decide the veredict, the decison will rest on whether the inclusion of the contract clause “to be used for daughter’s wedding reception on May 2nd created an express condition rendering the time of performance vital to the purpose of the contract.
If the time for performance is not of the essence, a reasonale time for performance is allowed. A late performance in such a case does not constitute material breach, but the party rendering late performance is liable for damages caused by the delay. In this case, although May 2nd would ordinarily be reasonable time for performance, the inclusion of the phrase giving the use of the wine and date of the reception would render the time vital to performance and would require strict compliance. Grapes & Vine’s failure to deliver on May 1 is a material breach releasing Elin from any liability under the contract.
