Answer:
EF = 6.6
Step-by-step explanation:
Since ABCD is similar to EFGH, then EH is similar to AD. So, we can solve by first dividing 12 by 2 (EH by AD). The quotient of this is 6. This tells us that quadrilateral EFGH is 6 times larger than quadrilateral ABCD, since they are similar. So, with this and the measurement of AB (which is similar to EF), we can now solve for EF. We simply multiply 1.1 (the measurement of AB) by 6 (how many times larger EFGH is compared to ABCD). The product of this is 6.6, our final answer.
0.25 is the probability that you would select a score between 300 and 700. I used the empirical rule when i solved this.
Answer:
Letter:C
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>#CARRY</u><u> </u><u>ON</u><u> </u><u>LEARNING</u>
<span>Last
year, the average math SAT score for students at one school was 475. The
headmaster then introduced a new teaching method hoping to improve scores. This
year, the mean math SAT score for a sample of students was 491. The headmaster
concluded that the new teaching method produces higher SAT scores. The problem
with reporting results this way is voluntary response. The information of how
the teaching method isnot mentioned.</span>
A and d seem correct to me.
b and c are definitely wrong.
