1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Digiron [165]
2 years ago
12

Order the following numbers from least to greatest 1.7, -2, -11/4, -0.5, ⅔ (hint: draw a number line)

Mathematics
2 answers:
JulsSmile [24]2 years ago
4 0

The answer is A. I hope this helps, have a great day!

Nutka1998 [239]2 years ago
4 0
I believe the answer would be A !
You might be interested in
I need help pleaseeeeee nowplease
marysya [2.9K]
This is a pretty complex problem
6 0
3 years ago
Simplify by factoring. What are the excluded values? Choose all that apply.
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

x = -2

x = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Excluded values are the ones which make the denominator zero

3x² + x - 10

3x² + 6x - 5x - 10

3x(x + 2) - 5(x + 2)

(x + 2)(3x - 5)

x² - 6x - 16

x² - 8x + 2x - 16

x(x - 8) + 2(x - 8)

(x - 8)(x + 2)

[(x + 2)(3x - 5)] ÷ [(x - 8)(x + 2)]

(3x - 5)/(x - 8)

So excluded values are 8, -2

6 0
3 years ago
Why is 4 + (−3) equal to 1?
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

2nd option

Step-by-step explanation:

4 + (-3) = 1 because the signs mismatch, something cannot be both positive or negative. When the signs are the same, whether it be both positive or both negative, the answer will always be positive, while if the signs are mismatching the answer will always be negative.

Hope I helped!

7 0
2 years ago
2
nignag [31]

Answer:

1st = 4×10 ^-9

2nd= 4×10^1

3rd = 4×10^7

4th = 4×10^-5

Step-by-step explanation:

for whole numbers you just have to count from the ending till the number indicated beside the x10

for decimals you count from the front starting at the decimal till you cover the whole number

6 0
9 months ago
Does the following table shows a proportional relationship between the variables g & h​
KATRIN_1 [288]

*the table being referred to is attached below

Answer:

The table does not show a proportional relationship between variable g and h.

Step-by-step explanation:

For a proportional relationship to exist between two variables, there must be a constant, of which serves like a unit rate, when comparing two variables.

Thus, in the table attached below, there is no obvious constant of proportionality between variable g and variable h.

Thus, \frac{9}{3} ≠ \frac{36}{6} ≠ \frac{81}{9}

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is bigger three fourths or two thirds
    14·2 answers
  • Trying to help my nephew with math been so long I forget how to do it . Arrange the numbers in increasing order. 8.08, 8.081, 8.
    15·2 answers
  • The Smiths are sending out a batch of holiday cards. Emily signed 2/5 of the cards. Then Josh signed 1/9 of the remaining cards.
    11·1 answer
  • Out of 1,000 people in a small town, 500 are members of a choir. Out of these 500 members in a choir, 100 are men. Out of the 50
    15·2 answers
  • What is the estimate for 5.29+6.78
    8·2 answers
  • Solve <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B4%20%7D%7B4%20-%20x%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B%284%20%2B%20x%29%7D%20
    13·1 answer
  • Help please I will Brainly
    5·2 answers
  • Please help this is another one I really don't understand!!
    13·1 answer
  • 4y/5 - 14/15 = 3/4<br><br> The answer is 2, how?
    10·1 answer
  • Determine the next three terms in the following sequence:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!