Answer:
b. Symbolic interactionist
Explanation:
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that studies the symbolic interaction between human beings involving use of dialect to make symbols and images for deduction and correspondence with others. I'm essence it it is involved with the relationships between individual in the form of interaction based on symbols such as how we may attach the the name cat to an animal.
Answer:
No, he is not guilty of criminal fraud because of
Explanation:
Roger is the CFO of a corporation and had a business dinner with some of the company's largest shareholders. Roger knowingly and intentionally started drinking a variety of alcoholic drinks and even excused himself to secretly snort cocaine in the men's room. By the end of the evening, he obviously intoxicated. His dinner companions kept buying more rounds of drinks, and Roger needed no urging to continue drinking. By dessert, he was obviously extremely intoxicated. At that point, his companions asked him to sign a variety of documents, which he did not read due to his condition. The documents turned out to be falsified financial statements, which were then supplied to the accountants who were auditing the company. Is Roger guilty of criminal fraud?
No,he is not guilty of criminal fraud because he was intoxicated, he likely could not have formed the required mens rea and would not be guilty of criminal fraud
.If voluntarily intoxicated to the point that criminal intent cannot be realized or formed, a defendant would not be guilty
Answer: a. chance variation is less likely to affect the results
Explanation:
The answer is 27 fam................................................
Answer:
2.1 How do you think these measures influence the evolution of the Palestinian-Israel conflict?
Those measures, while being effective in making life safer in Israel, for Israeli citizens, are likely to escalate the conflict, since they represent a restriction to the right of free movement of Palestinian citizens.
2.2 What measures would you take to avoid discrimination and resolve the conflict?
The conflict is extremely complex, and many measures have been tried in the past. Most experts agree that the best solution (not necessarily the most plausible solution) is a definitive two-state division between Israel and the state of Palestine.
The problem is that Israel continues to occupy areas that are supposedly Palestinian lands, and that some of the Palestinian authorities continue to promote violence and terrorism against Israel in response to the occupation.
