The answer to that question is Random Sampling
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
Distance between x's (Δx)
0
This field is calculated automatically, you cannot change it's value manually.
Distance between y's (Δy)
1
d = √(Δy2 + Δx2) = √(12 + 02) = √1 = 1
3x + y = 3
7x + 2y = 1
First isolate one of the variables (x or y) in one of the equations.
Isolate "y" in the first equation(because it is the easiest to isolate) and substitute it into the second equation.
3x + y = 3 Subtract 3x on both sides
3x - 3x + y = 3 - 3x
y = 3 - 3x
7x + 2y = 1
7x + 2(3 - 3x) = 1 [since y = 3 - 3x, you can substitute (3-3x) for "y"]
Multiply/distribute 2 into (3 - 3x)
7x + (3(2) - 3x(2)) = 1
7x + 6 - 6x = 1
x + 6 = 1 Subtract 6 on both sides
x = -5
Now that you know "x", substitute it into one of the equations (I will do both)
3x + y = 3
3(-5) + y = 3 [since x = -5, you can plug in -5 for "x"]
-15 + y = 3 Add 15 on both sides
y = 18
7x + 2y = 1
7(-5) + 2y = 1
-35 + 2y = 1 Add 35 on both sides
2y = 36 Divide 2 on both sides
y = 18
x = -5, y = 18 or (-5, 18)
Answer: option <span>D) y=x, x-axis, y=x, y-axis</span>.
I first thought it was the option C) and I tried with it but it was wrong. This is how I dit it.
Option C step by step:
<span>1) Reflection over the x - axis => point with coordinates (a,b) is transformed into point with coordinates (a, -b)
2) Reflection over the line y = x => point with coordinates (a, -b) is transformed into point with coordinates (-b,a)
3) New feflection over the x - axis => (-b,a) transforms into (-b, -a)
4) New reflection over the line y = x => (-b,-a) transforms into (-a,-b)
Which shows it is not the option C).
Then I probed with option D. Step by step:
1) Reflection over the line y = x => (a,b) → (b,a)
2) Reflection over the x-axis => (b,a) → (b,-a)
3) Reflection over the line y = x => (b,-a) → (-a,b)
4) Reflection over the y-axis => (-a,b) → (a,b).
So, this set of reflections, given by the option D) transforms any point into itself, which proofs that the option D) is the right answer.
</span>
