Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
A. (6,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
4a- 5b = 24
Check each point to see if its is true
A. (6,0)
4(6) - 5(0) = 24
24 = 24
true
B. (-5, -2)
4(-5) -5(-2)= 24
-20 +10 = 24
-10 =24
False
C. (0,6)
4(0) -5(6) =24
-30 =24
False
D. (-2, -5)
4(-2) -5(-5)=24
-8+25=24
18=24
False
Answer:
B, I think that's the answer
Answer: Its surface covers 1400 cm²
Explanation:
Since the length of painting = 40 cm
Breadth of painting = 35 cm
Since we know that area of rectangle is product of dimensions.
∴ Area of painting = length × breadth
= 40 cm × 35 cm
= 1400 cm²
∴ Its surface cover 1400 cm².
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
-8 is less than -4. Negative numbers reverse the logic of positive ones: since positive 8 is more than positive 4, negative 8 is less than negative 4.
