Answer:
1. Alley goes with narrow
2. Rattle goes with noisy
3. Raggedy goes with shredded
4. Invisible goes with hidden
Explanation:
1. Alley goes with narrow because an alley is a narrow passageway between buildings.
2. Rattle goes with noisy because when you shake a rattle, it makes a lot of noise, therefore making it <em>noisy</em>.
3. Raggedy goes with shredded because having raggedy clothes means that you have <em>shredded</em> worn out clothes, and it needs patches.
4. Invisible goes with hidden because when something is invisible, you can't see them, meaning that they are <em>hidden</em> away from our sight.
Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
Answer:
The Vietnam War was a long, costly and divisive conflict that pitted the communist government of North Vietnam against South Vietnam and its principal ally, the United States. The conflict was intensified by the ongoing Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
