Answer:
The answer is an intractable conflict.
Explanation:
An intractable conflict refers to a conflict that is usually considered so severe and in this way, it can be impossible to solve, as well as it can provoke some kind of violence.
In these kinds of conflicts, the two parts that are involved usually consider that there is no solution to the conflict. This situation can produce intense anger and in many cases, violence appears because of all emotions that are involved.
Answer:
Semantic encoding.
Explanation:
When the meaning of a date, phrase, word, picture, etc, is encoded as opposed to the sound or imagery of it, we call that semantic encoding. In the exercise, the encoding would be the same date that shares the anniversary of Whitneys neighbours with her own birthday. They, ignoring the fact that its her birthday, believe that she never forgets. But she has, in fact, a semantic encoding with the dates.
Answer:
Generativity versus stagnation
Explanation:
Generality against stagnation is really the seventh among eight phases of behavioral growth philosophy from Erik Erikson. The whole phase occurs between ages of about 40 to 65 throughout central adulthood. The eighth as well as final stage is honesty vs misery.
Throughout this period, individuals seek to build or cultivate qualities that will outlive them; often through raising kids or leading to great changes that help others. Going to contribute to community and doing things to support coming generations become critical requirements at the developmental stage of generality against stagnation.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
most contraceptive pills contain both estrogen and progestin
Answer:
Set the precedent for judicial review.
Explanation:
Marbury and Madison was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States involving the ongoing feud between two presidents, one outgoing and the other incoming. The rivalry between these two led to the now infamous case of Marbury vs. Madison. Outgoing president John Adams accused the incoming president Thomas Jefferson of not delivering the commissions of the new circuit judges. Due to their conflicting interests and the fact that Adams did it to frustrate his successor, the case got even more complicated.
As it involves the judges and the officials of the federal level, the new Supreme Court decision regarding this case made it mandatory that courts in the U.S. have the right to act against any law or acts or rulings that may harm the very nature of the Constitution of the United States. Thus, William Marbury, one of the officials whose commission wasn't passed through, got his way when he filed a lawsuit which ordered James Madison, the Secretary of State to do the needful.
