Answer:
The guilty but mentally ill
Explanation:
Basically, judges and juries take into an hand that to find a defendant guilty of committing an offense while formally ill/ sick.
(so it proving one guilty but ALSO saying that they understand that the person in the wrong was/is ill or sick.
(i did not copy anything all in my own words)
Have a good day.
-Hailey
Answer:
Overall in America, the fingerprint pattern frequencies I hear most often are 60% to 65% loops, 30 to 35% whorls and 5% arches
Answer:
Habeas corpus.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation.
Therefore, when a judge with competent jurisdiction decides on an issue, his or her decision is final and can only be changed (upturned) by another court ruling.
This ultimately implies that, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A legal order for an investigation into whether a person who is arrested has been imprisoned legally defines habeas corpus.
Additionally, habeas corpus ensures protection for an individual from imprisonment without being charged legally with a crime. The individual reports his or her illegal (unlawful) imprisonment or detention to a court in order to regain freedom.
Uhhhh is this a punishment the judge gave you? Simple answer speeding is dangerous because you are not advising the speed limits which are carefully measured and enrolled in areas in which the department of public safety believes is appropriate enough to not cause accidents and hazards.
Answer:
It is then to the respective court to determine what exactly it means. When a law is unclear, a judge interprets it and determines what? When the legislature passes unclear law or ambiguous law the judiciary is forced to decide what the law really means. Once the citizens have accepted judges deciding what the law really is, instead of the Congress passing clear law. The judiciary is empowered to interpret law.
Hope this helped you!
Explanation: