1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
10

Libertarians think that each of us the right to do whatever we want with the things we own, provided we respect other people's r

ights to do the same. further, they think that such rights are so important and inviolable that respecting them is more important than achieving any outcome. why do they think these things? are these plausible claims?
e.g., is a person's right to exclude others from her property more important than a human life? why or why not?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Serggg [28]3 years ago
8 0
Libertarians have a proper understanding of liberty and dignity.  It wasn't until the 1850s that the GREAT EVILS of the philosophy of liberalism started to take root in the feeble minded.
You might be interested in
According to researchers, well-informed people are unlikely to change their minds when they learn something new from the news me
SVEN [57.7K]

Well-informed people are unlikely to change their mind, according to researchers, because: they have already decided what they think.

<h3>Who are Well-informed People?</h3>

An individual that is well-informed is not easily swayed by public opinions or news media publish about a subject matter that they already have facts about.

Well-informed people think deeply before they believe whatever propagander that is being promoted by any news media.

Therefore, well-informed people are unlikely to change their mind, according to researchers, because: they have already decided what they think.

Learn more about well-informed people on:

brainly.com/question/15007670

7 0
2 years ago
Laud Humphreys’s research on homosexual activities in men’s restrooms became a famous case of ethical controversy in social scie
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.

Explanation:

Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.

3 0
3 years ago
knowing that they would say no, joel asked his parents for a new car for his birthday. once they said no, he followed up by aski
rosijanka [135]

With his parents, Joel was employing the door-in-the-face compliance technique.

A compliance tactic that is frequently researched in social psychology is the door-in-the-face approach. The persuader makes a sizable request that the respondent will probably reject in an effort to get them to agree, kind of like metaphorically slamming a door in the persuader's face.

In the door-in-the-face method, compliance is improved by making an incredibly difficult request first, followed by a target request that is genuinely wanted.

An illustration of this would be if you refused a friend's request to borrow an excessive amount of money, only for them to later ask for a lower amount and receive your approval. The door-in-the-face tactic is frequently employed to get individuals to make a financial contribution.

To learn more about door-in-the-face technique

brainly.com/question/29380131

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Please help me, I have to fill in the blanks and I am not so smart
andriy [413]

Answer:

Stone

Explanation:

I would say stone because diversity fits the one above it and it makes more sense then stone does in the sentence.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a territorry?​
Rzqust [24]
An area of land under the ruler or a state
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the constitution, the principle of federalism is the reason that power and responsibility are
    6·1 answer
  • During a nursing interview, a client says, "My daughter was murdered in her New York apartment, and her estranged husband called
    5·1 answer
  • We’re islands a important stopping place for ships on a route to Asian
    9·1 answer
  • A teacher shows a first grade student a map and tells her, "You live here, in Atlanta, Georgia." The child emphatically disagree
    5·2 answers
  • Which describes the goal of Roosevelt's cash-and-carry policy?
    14·2 answers
  • A number of individual beats grouped together is called
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement about new federalism is not true?a.New federalism was launched by President Nixon and continued by President Rea
    13·1 answer
  • there are three factors that determine the elasticity of demand for goods and service. select all of the factors that determine
    5·1 answer
  • Why is the National Anthem considered our national Glory? Explain​
    11·2 answers
  • How might parents indirectly affect the likelihood of children both being victim of bullying and a perpetrator of bullying
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!