1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
10

Libertarians think that each of us the right to do whatever we want with the things we own, provided we respect other people's r

ights to do the same. further, they think that such rights are so important and inviolable that respecting them is more important than achieving any outcome. why do they think these things? are these plausible claims?
e.g., is a person's right to exclude others from her property more important than a human life? why or why not?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Serggg [28]3 years ago
8 0
Libertarians have a proper understanding of liberty and dignity.  It wasn't until the 1850s that the GREAT EVILS of the philosophy of liberalism started to take root in the feeble minded.
You might be interested in
What was one result of the increase of trade that followed the Crusades?
agasfer [191]

Answer:

The main result from the increase of trade that followed the Crusades was the further development of several European and Middle Eastern cities, especially those with ports in the Mediterranean, and the development of closer ties between the two regions.

Cities like Venice, Genoa, Pisa, Amalfi, Constantinople and Accre benefited quite a lot from this new trade developments, and became, accordingly, some of the wealthiest areas of the region at the time.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
The suspect is a male in his early 30’s. he is accused of breaking into a convenience store to rob them. he has a bat in his han
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

because he need money to live

Explanation:

im not sure

mark as brainliest if it helps

6 0
2 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
1 year ago
Sociologists argue that the sociological perspective combined with the scientific method gives them the ability to make signific
yan [13]

Answer:

A follower of structural-functionalism would look at the college classroom as an institution, and try to find what holds it together. He would analyze tertiary education is an important factor in today's society, and why college classroom s are the means to access tertiary education.

A follower of the conflict perspective would look at the conflicts between professor and students, or among the students themselves, and how those conflict shape social relationships in the classroom.

A follower of symbolic interactionism would look at the symbols in the classroom, and how students and professors relate to them, or in other words, what those symbols mean to them.

4 0
3 years ago
Jerome, a manager at Welford Nonprofit Group, is known for his selflessness and willingness to give to others. He likes working
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

Servant leader

Explanation:

A servant leader is best described as a type of leader that focuses on serving other people as their main goal.  This style of leadership is different from traditional leadership where the leader's main focus is the thriving of their company or organizations.

A servant leader values diverse opinions, cultivates a culture of trust, helps people with life issues, encourages, think of other people and acts with humility.

In this example, Jerome is a manager known for his <u>selflessness and willingness to give</u> to others. We can see that <u>he likes to help other people </u>and <u>thinks about the needs of other people</u> rather than about his own, also he <u>acts with humilit</u>y by acting selflessness and giving to others.

Thus, the leadership that best describes him is the servant leader.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jenny is in psychotherapy for an eating disorder. Her therapist is warm and supportive and can easily take her perspective. He e
    9·1 answer
  • According to the filter model of attention, which of the following messages would likely be identified by the filter? Group of a
    12·1 answer
  • List two of the largest and most consistent gender role differences among boys and girls
    15·2 answers
  • Substitutes are pairs of products : A. positive cross-price elasticity of demand B. negative cross-price elasticity of demand C.
    7·1 answer
  • When the war for mexican independence ended in 1812, the area of texas was a) part of spain b) part of mexico c) and independent
    13·2 answers
  • ​a(n) wrap-up review is a detailed examination and discussion of the events that occurred during an incident or disaster, from f
    13·1 answer
  • What was a change proposed by the Single European Act? Multiple Choice establish frontier controls among European Community coun
    7·1 answer
  • Oscar is thirteen and frequently twists his head uncontrollably, and yelps or grunts. If he has not done this for several hours,
    7·1 answer
  • The writers of the United States Constitution included the requirement for a census every ten years primarily to *
    12·1 answer
  • For training to be effective, the audience must be receptive and engaged and ready to take appropriate actions. What security tr
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!