Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
Let us suppose, we pour x glass of water.
The given jug is of 6 liters. And the glass of water was seven- eighths of a liter. Hence, we have the below equation
Now, in order to solve for x, we will divide 6 with 7/8. So, we have to divide.
Hence, we can pour 7 glass of water. But the 7th glass is not full of water. It is partially full.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
range?
