1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
12

6 x - 2 [ x + 2 ] > 2 - 3 [ x + 3] could u show me step by step on how to do thiz

Mathematics
1 answer:
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

x > - 3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

6x - 2x - 4 > 2 - 3 (x + 3)

6x - 2x - 4 > 2 - 3x - 9

4x - 4 > 2 - 3x - 9

4x - 4 > - 7 - 3x

4x - 4 + 3x > - 7

7x > - 7 + 4

7x > - 3

You might be interested in
The ampitude/frequency/period of y=1/4cos1/2x is 4 pie
Fantom [35]
Amplitude: 1/4 (= |a|)
Frequency: 1/2 (= |b|)
Period: 4pi (= 2pi/|b|)
7 0
4 years ago
Where was a error made in combining and solving the equation below?
Lera25 [3.4K]
It should be a positive 5 not a negative so the error was made at the end because u divide
3 0
3 years ago
The table below shows the educational attainment of a country's population, aged 25 and over. Use the data in the table, express
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

The answer is "\bold{\frac{22}{171}}"

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 22 million males that have completed four years of undergraduate, according to the data below: (or more). This is predicated on a population of 171 million.

The chances we're searching about \frac{(22\ million)}{(171\ million)} = \frac{22}{171}

however

This proportion could be further reduced because 22 and 171 have no common features (other than 1).

3 0
3 years ago
Im doing decimals greatest to least and i need help with number 12 and 13
erma4kov [3.2K]

(I know there isnt any real problem here to solve, but heres a tip on how to solve greatest to least with decimal problems)

1. Just because a number looks big, doesn't mean it is big

Example: 1.00000000000001 < 1.1

just look at the numbers ^ and dont just hastily read it over assuming that 1.1 is smaller because it "has less digits"

2. Negative numbers are... opposite. and they are less than positive numbers

-3.4 > -4.1

Why is this? Well, if you look on a line, with the point 0 in the middle, you can see that -3.4 is not as far away from 0 as -4.1 is. So the idea is to apply opposite logic for negative numbers

I hope these tips helped!! :D

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me ASAP with this math problem
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

Root( c square -9)

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer u have is the answer for a^2

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Zane performs the elementary row operation represented by R2-½R1 on matrix A.​
    15·2 answers
  • What is the value of x?
    6·1 answer
  • How do change 10/4 into a mixed number
    6·2 answers
  • Name the quadrilaterals that have four equal angles. A. rhombus, square B. Square, rectangle C. parallelogram, rhombus D. rhombu
    13·2 answers
  • PLZZ SOMEONE HELP I HAVE FIVE MORE MINUTES LEFT ON MY TEST TO ANSWER THIS ONE QUESTION
    15·1 answer
  • The spinner below shows 5 equally sized slices. Tammy spun the dial 25 times and got the following results. Fill in the table be
    13·1 answer
  • Find integral∫cos³x dx) )?​
    14·2 answers
  • A 100 rupee note was changed to 10 and 5 rupee notes, 15 notes in all. How many of each notes?​
    11·2 answers
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B3x%2B33%2B17%3D20" id="TexFormula1" title="\sqrt{3x+33+17=20" alt="\sqrt{3x+33+17=20
    7·1 answer
  • Write the equation of the blue line using slope intercept form (y=mx+b)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!