The correct answer is B) Averting behavior.
Environmental economists seek to implement a study to examine public preferences for alternative forest landscapes. Respondents are asked to choose one of several plans that depict environmental changes from the baseline condition of forests. The nonmarket valuation method that describes this study is Averting behavior.
When trying to find answers in this type of research to know the preferences of the public regarding alternatives to help the forest, the Avertin behavior method helps researches to find useful answers. When applying this research model, researches presume that people interviewed are prone to participate and do something that prevents the consequences mentioned in the question. It takes into consideration that people will do what it takes in order to limit or avoid the negative consequences presented.
Answer:
There are many pros and cons to this concept.
The pros are that we have better materials for protection and offense for our military. Also, this gives individuals better defense, as well.
The cons to this concept is that people in the wrong state of mind can easily injure or worse kill vulnerable people.
So what does this say about the United States in general?
The United States is like a pan balance; if there aren’t many weapons, there will be fewer massacres, shootings and robberies. But, say someone in a situation where that does happen, there is a higher and unfortunate chance that they won’t be able to protect themselves. If there are lots of weapons, there will be more crime, but also an increase in defense & protection and a decrease in vulnerability.
The United States is full of extremely intelligent people which can have dangerous consequences. An increase in weapons technology is another step up in nature and it shows America’s power, brilliance, and intelligence. This will make the U.S. military undefeatable.
