Answer:
The myth of Psyche is about a beautiful young woman whom the goddess Aphrodite grew jelous of because the people of the land praised her as the goddess of love. Aphrodite ordered the god Eros (cupid) to shoot psyche with an arrow of love causing her to fall in love with something or someone ugly and dis honnorable to psyche's family. Eros went to pshye to shoot her but accidentally shot himself in the foot when he marvled at her beauty. An oracle told Psyche to go to the top of a cliff dressed to be wed to her new husband, a monster. she goes to the cliff and jumps. she is wisked away to a beautiful castle in the clouds. she meets her husband there. he tells her to never view him while he is sleeping. he is hidden for a reason to protect her. he tells her that he loves her and she believes him. she falls in love with him. one day her husband allows her sisters to visit her. her sisters were always jelous of Psyche they tell her that her husband is a monster who wants to kill her. she let their doubt get to her head. she tried to view her husband while he slept. she viewed his beautiful face and saw that he was the god of love. her candle dripped wax on to his shoulder and woke him up. he left, angry that Psyche betrayed him by doing what he asked her to. he left and fled to Aphrodite who charged the girl with impossible missions. she made Psyche literally go to the underworld to proove her love to Eros. Psyche was tricked by Aphrodite to open up a makeup container that Persephone had her bring to Aphrodite. Psyche let Aphrodite get in to her head. psyche opened the container and unleashed a curse that put her on the brink of death. Eros found the strength to rush to his loves side. he demanded that Zeus make her a goddess. Zeus said yes out of fear of Eros and his powers of love. Psyche became a goddess after slaving away for Aphrodite for months. the story ended happily.
one moral of the story could be dont let others and their insecurities effect you and your decisions
If you're asking for the definition, then goods that are sold abroad are exports.
Answer:
People wanted protection for number 1, and shrines for number 2.
Plz translate, I’m not very flaunt in Spanish
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
