Answer: b) Directory information
Explanation:
Directory information is the data and fact about student in their education directory or record.These records do not fall in confidential category so, if data in these record is disclosed then it is not considered privacy invasion situation.These details comes under consent of parents, guardian or student.
Other options are incorrect because affiliation in terms of religion, citizenship and SAT score are confidential terms that should not be disclosed to anyone without permission.Thus, the correct option is option(d).
Answer:
Explanation:
A river gives the inhabitants a reliable source of water for drinking and agriculture. Additional benefits include fishing, fertile soil due to annual flooding, and ease of transportation. The first great civilizations, such as those in Mesopotamia, Harappa and Ancient Egypt, all grew up in river valleys.
Answer:
This scenario is indicative of a double standard of sexuality.
Explanation:
The sexual double standard is when a women is judged differently for the same sexual act that a man had done.
Signal detection theory; it states how stress or tension increases the sensitivity to faint pain stimuli.
More about Signal detection theory:
SDT, or signal detection theory, is a method for assessing sensitivity in decision-making. Early in the 1950s, radar researchers first created
SDT's main concept is that decisions are made against an uncertain backdrop, and the decision-objective maker's is to separate the decision signal from the background noise. SDT can be used in any situation involving a binary choice where the decision-reaction maker's can be compared to the target's actual existence or absence.
Usage:
Signal detection theory (SDT) is used when psychologists want to measure the way we make decisions under conditions of uncertainty, such as how we would perceive distances in foggy conditions or during eyewitness identification.
Learn more about SDT here:
brainly.com/question/10339556
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. Ha: # of bugs with the new pesticide = # of bugs with the old pesticide
Explanation:
As seen in the question above, the new insecticide may have better results than the old insecticide that David used in his garden. To find out if this is true, David decides to spray one side of the Garden with the new insecticide and spray the other side of the garden with the old insecticide, so that he can count which of the two insecticides killed more insects and thus determine which of the products is more efficient.
To determine efficiency, David's chances are:
- # of bugs with the new pesticide < # of bugs with the old pesticide
- # of bugs with the new pesticide > # of bugs with the old pesticide
However, it is necessary to consider an alternative hypothesis, where the evaluation of the results is null. Thus, the alternative hypothesis for David's experiment is:
- # of bugs with the new pesticide = # of bugs with the old pesticide
