<span>The net benefits of each public good will be the total cost of the project minus the $300 cost per person. If the project costs 600$ the net benefits for each public good will be $300.
$600(total cost) - $300(cost per person) = $300(net benefits)</span>
The percentage of the disposable income that is discretionary is equal to 30.82% if the amount left after fixed expenses is $900.
As the amount left after payment of the fixed expenses is $900, this is said to be the discretionary income because discretionary income is equal to the disposable income minus fixed expenses.
Now we can calculate the percentage of disposable income that is discretionary as follows;
percentage of disposable income that is discretionary = (discretionary income ÷ disposable income) × 100
% discretionary income = (900 ÷ 2,920) × 100
% discretionary income = 90,000 ÷ 2,920
% discretionary income = 30.82%
Hence, 30.82% of the disposable income is calculated to be discretionary if the disposable income is $2,920 and the amount left after payment of fixed expenses is $900.
To learn more about discretionary income, click here:
brainly.com/question/15814704
#SPJ4
Answer:
$150,000
Explanation:
Economic profit is accounting profit less implicit cost or opportunity cost.
Accounting profit = Total revenue - Total cost
Economic profit = Total revenue - Total cost - Opportunity cost
Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives. The opoortunty cost of the web designer is $50,000.
Revenue is $550,000
Total cost = $250,000 + $30,000 + $70,000 = $350,000
Economic profit = 550,000 - $350,000 - $50,000 = $150,000
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements
Answer:
<em>Sam's dividend income is $225,000 and has a reduction of stock basis of $27,500</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>From the example ,</em>
<em>Given that,</em>
<em>Sam stock is =$52.500</em>
<em>Blue corporation has deficit in accumulated E and P which is =$300,000</em>
<em>Blue corporation has current E and P of = $225,000</em>
<em>Blue distributes $250,000 to its shareholder on July 1st</em>
<em>Therefore,</em>
<em>Blue corporation has a current E & P of $225,000, to an extent, Sam has a taxable dividend. The remaining $25,000 reduces his basis stock.</em>
<em>Sam has an income dividend of $225,000 and reduces his stock basis to $27,500.</em>
