Answer:
c. $37,200
Explanation:
I suppose this is the complete question:
You must chooce one of the amounts below.
Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children. As part of the divorce decree (dated June 1, 2018), Frank was ordered to continue to pay the full mortgage payments as well as cash payments to his ex-wife. Frank was also ordered to pay child support for the children. Frank pays the following amounts: • Alimony in the amount of $1,300 cash per month • Mortgage payments in the amount of $1,800 per month • Child support in the amount of $800 per month How much can Frank deduct as alimony? Select one: a. $26,400 b. $46,800 c. $37,200 d. $36,000?
1. Accord and satisfaction
That’s the only one I will answer but I hoped it helped a little
Answer:
D
Explanation:Federalism is the believe of distribution of power
Answer and Explanation:
Charging a fellow plumber that he is acting dishonest in removing his business is really an infringement according to the arrangements of the state council. Each body has equivalent chance to work and any nobody has the option to blame an other individual in the business. Requesting business is right according to the law. It is up to the clients who they decided for the administrations. It isn't viewed as dishonest.
If the Rodger's service are great, at that point his clients won't leave him for better service regardless of whether somebody like Sam requests business. Since, Rodger's service are not acceptable, his clients are dismissing for better benefits. What's more, Sam is at a preferred position. In business, it is right to offer decisions to the clients. What's more, it is under the tact of the clients on who they pick. Clients reserve the option to pick the best.
Any business man can advance his service but In any case, he can't support his costumers saying they can't go else where, neither one of the hes should utilize unscrupulous intends to keep them from not going else where.
The outcome will be, Rodger will be charged for disregarding the standard of mishandling a kindred handyman. I would contend Sam's case by saying that requesting isn't unscrupulous. It is a sort of an oral advancement for the service one is managing in. Along these lines, Sam requesting Rodger's clients isn't considered as dishonest.
In the affiliation, each body will have a lot of clients, and each body has the option to morally request about themselves and their business. Nobody can't limit another person's the same old thing. Clients reserve the privilege to pick what they need and whom they ought to pick.
