Answer:
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
paragraphs are in the Explanation
Explanation:
Option 1: They shouldn’t because that’s there property that got destroyed.
There could have been something that the land owners wanted to tare down because they wanted to build something new, that could benefit them.
Its there property that they bought with there money they should be able to build something on it.
It might benifit society and themselves so I believe yes.
_________________________________________________________
Option 2: They should because it could be used for the government in some way.
It was frequently damaged by nature so they must have been tired of see it being rebuilt and destroyed.
It could be benifical to the area around it.
It could save the land owner money to
sorry if it’s not to your likeing or if it took so long
Answer:
C: The Victims Rights & Restitution Act of 1990
