Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
<span>This touches on the main issue of balancing the rights of all citizens. As a society we are guaranteed public rights for the good of the group. As individuals, we are guaranteed rights to preserve our own freedom. In this example and in so many others, it is important to balance the right of freedom of the press with the freedom of a free and fair trial.</span>
<span>Chile is the country that is the farthest southwest in South America.</span>
<span>"Physical distractions"
</span>There are many type of distractions such as psychological
distractions or semantic distractions which refer to different kinds.
<span>Physical distractions come in the form of things you can see,
hear, taste, touch or smell public speaking flash cards</span>
