Answer:
Your opinion
Explanation:
Below is my answer, but I have done a lot of research already:
- The ultimate aim of the Nazi Party was to seize power through Germany's parliamentary system
- By 1941 Nazi forces had occupied much of Europe.
- Adolf Hitler, the leader of Germany’s Nazi Party
- Hitler became interested in politics during his years in Vienna
- The Holocaust was the sponsored<em>(and I mean state-sponsored)</em> mass murder of some 6 million European Jews.
- Ethnic cleansing and genocide
- Started on September 1, 1939
- Brutally treated children, and even elderly
I hope to convey the message the the series of events that occurred is something that was done after research after reading Anne Frank's diary and visiting various Holocaust memorial websites. I do not with that any of the facts above be taken in the wrong way and I mean no offense.
Hope this helps,
--Applepi101
9 x 4 = 36. Hope this helps!
Florida was NOT one of the first thirteen original colonies.
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
Answer:
Second Battle of Bull Run
Explanation:
#FreeMelvin
