Q = p(r + s)
Use the distributive property
Q = pr + ps
Q = p x r + p x s
Q = p x p + r x s
Q = p^2 + rs
Subtract rs from both sides
Q - rs = p^2
Square root both sides
sqrt Q - rs = p
Answer:
−6a − 35b + 48c
Step-by-step explanation:
You do pemdas and if you know Pemads you will get your anwser
Answer: Table H would be the correct answer;
The rule of a function is that for each x-value given there can't be more than 1 y-value
<u>In Table F:</u>
x = -13, then y = -2
x = -13, then y = 0
x = -13, then y = 5
x = -13, then y = 7
For the x-value -13, there are 4 different y-values, so <em>it's not a function.</em>
<u>In Table G:</u>
x = -6, then y = 3
x = -1, then y = -1
x = -1, then y = 5
x = 10, then y = -9
For the x-value -1, there are 2 different y-values, hence <em>this isn't a function.</em>
<u>In Table H:</u>
x = 1, then y = 4
x = 3, then y = 4
x = 7, then y = 4
x = 12, then y = 4
For each x-value, there is only 1 y-value, so <em>this is a function.</em>
<u>In table J:</u>
x = -9, then y = -7
x = -2, then y = -5
x = 0, then y = 0
x = 0, then y = 6
For the x-value 0, there are 2 different y-value therefore <em>this isn't a function</em>
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Option A, there is not sufficient sample evidence to conclude that the full-time placement rate is now less than 87% because the p-value is greater than 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here the Null hypothesis would be
H0: 87% of the graduates find full-time employment in their field within the first year of graduation
H1: Less than 87% of the graduates find full-time employment in their field within the first year of graduation
Here the p values is 0.07.
Since the p value is greater than 0.05, there are not enough evidences to reject the hull hypothesis.
Hence, option A is correct
