Answer:
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella are guilty because they could have told Columbus no when he sent a letter requesting more support. Instead they continued to fund his expedition, encouraging his action, in the hope of getting more gold and slaves as Columbus promised. The King and Queen just wanted to be more rich and powerful, without their monetary support Columbus would not have been able to continue his expeditions. In addition, the King and Queen did not care about the Taínos’ lives because some of them refused to convert to Christianity. In Spain the King and Queen persecuted anyone who did not convert to Christianity and they encouraged this same method in the Caribbean toward the Taínos .
Explanation:
Have a nice day and good luck :)
According to St. Thomas' natural law theory, people employ three criteria to determine what is good or evil: fulfilling their actual nature, pursuing happiness, and obeying God's mandates.
Natural law theory:
- According to the ethics and philosophy notion known as "natural law," human beings have inherent values that guide their thought and behavior. According to natural law, people naturally possess these concepts of good and wrong; they were not developed by society or legal authorities.
- Ancient Greeks were aware of the principle of natural law, which was later developed by other philosophers. Aristotle, Plato, and Thomas Aquinas are three significant philosophers who helped shape natural law. The natural law hypothesis has been surrounded by numerous issues and worries.
- In philosophy, natural law is a theory of justice or right that is believed to be universal to all people and derived from the laws of nature rather than from positive laws or social norms.
Learn more about natural law theory here brainly.com/question/11298929
#SPJ4
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
While D is also correct, A is most correct. The US government cannot offer public services and other tax fueled services if everyone chooses not to pay.
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the country.
Answer: The fact that the Supreme Court can declare laws unconstitutional shows that their duty is to interpret the law. They judge whether new laws fit with previous ones, and with the Constitution itself, which is above every other law.
