Juliet inquires as to whether he truly loves her, having come to acknowledge that Romeo may effortlessly deceive her with a specific end goal to exploit her. Juliet is worried that Romeo may figure she can easily be taken in light of the fact that she isn't distant.
It seems that you have missed the given options for this question, but anyway, here is the answer. <span>When a psychologist compares the symptoms an individual is experiencing to the symptoms of various disorders to determine the specific disorder the individual has, the psychologist is concerned with the DIAGNOSIS. Other options include treatment, prognosis and etiology. Hope this answer helps. </span>
The correct answer would be option C, Emotional Component.
Ms. Kozena's negative feeling about junk food best illustrates the Emotional Component of Attitudes.
Explanation:
There are three main components of attitudes. These components are as follows:
- Affective Component
- Behavioral Component and
- Cognitive Component
This model of attitude is also called the ABC model of attitude.
In the Affective component of the attitude, Emotional component comes. This component shows or refers to an emotional reaction that one may have towards an attitude or object or anything.
So when Ms. Kozena told her adolescent children that she gets upset when she sees her children eating junk food, is a side of emotional component in which she has a negative attitude towards eating junk food.
Learn more about Attitude components at:
brainly.com/question/3045586
#LearnWithBrainly
Variables affecting the business cycle include marketing, finances, competition and time.
HOPE IT HELPS:)
Congress would most likely rely on the following:
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution declares the laws of the Constitution as supreme over state laws. In the case of conflict, federal law takes precedence over state laws and state constitutions. This cqn be found in Article 6, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution.
States would most likely rely on:
The nullification theory allowing states to nullify federal laws they find as unconstitutional, or interposition the right of a state to interpose between the states citizens and the federal government.
