In geometry proofs, we commonly use step-by-step logic to figure out the proof. This is commonly used in Computer Science for understanding how computers work, process, and store information(I speak from personal experience). This is also commonly used in Law. You use this in Law as a lawyer to deduce information using step-by-step logical processes and logic, otherwise it's just wishful thinking. So, Law also uses the same reasoning skills used in Geometry proofs.
Answer:
Option B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The non-uniform probability is when the event is not same in the occurring of event.
Option A is uniform because there will be equal chance of getting head or tail.
Option B is non-uniform because sum can be any number if we get(3,4) it will be 7 and if we have (2,3) then it will be 5.
Option C is uniform because we have equal number of red and green balls so, selecting a ball from both will be same.
Option D is uniform because chance of 1,2,,3,4,5 or 6 will be equal chance from rolling a die that is 1/6 in all cases.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer:
I think the answer is c
Step-by-step explanation:
please give me brainlist
Answer:
4' - 9.64
Step-by-step explanation:
Total rise = 2' - 7"
Total run = 3' - 9"
Converting to inches :
1' = 12" ; 1 feet = 12 inches
2' = 2 * 12 = 24"
3' = 3 * 12 = 36"
Total rise = 24" + 7" = 31"
Total run = 36" + 9" = 45"
Length of stringer = hypotenus
Hypotenus = √(total rise² + total run²)
Hypotenus = √(31² + 45²)
Hypotenus = 54.644304"
= 4' - 9.64"
