Hope this helped and I’ve shown my work and the answer! :)
Answer:
x=2 and y=0
Step-by-step explanation:
Rewrite equations:
y=−4x+8;y=
3
5
x+
−6
5
Step: Solvey=−4x+8for y:
y=−4x+8
Step: Substitute−4x+8foryiny=
3
5
x+
−6
5
:
y=
3
5
x+
−6
5
−4x+8=
3
5
x+
−6
5
−4x+8+
−3
5
x=
3
5
x+
−6
5
+
−3
5
x(Add (-3)/5x to both sides)
−23
5
x+8=
−6
5
−23
5
x+8+−8=
−6
5
+−8(Add -8 to both sides)
−23
5
x=
−46
5
−23
5
x
−23
5
=
−46
5
−23
5
(Divide both sides by (-23)/5)
x=2
Step: Substitute2forxiny=−4x+8:
y=−4x+8
y=(−4)(2)+8
y=0(Simplify both sides of the equation)
Answer:
v=6
Step-by-step explanation:
First let's simplify the equation so it will be easier to PEMDAS the equation later.
-7v+4(2-5v)=-154
-7v+8-20v=-154
-27v+8=-154
Now you must isolate the v variable. You do this by subtracting 8 first and then divide by -27.
-27v+8=-154
-27v=-162
v = 6
Primary effects are the direct result of the natural disaster, such as collapsed buildings and water damage. Secondary effects are the result of primary effects. ... Tertiary effects are the long term effects of natural disasters.
Answer:
: p= .78
: p > .78
Step-by-step explanation:
Determining the null and alternate hypotheses of a scenario require several components. The first is if one should use p or mu. This depends on if they are assessing a proportion or a mean, since the publisher states a percentage, you know that they are asking for a proportion, and therefore should use p. Next, they will need to assess what value to use for the hypothesis statements, here only .78 is provided and therefore should be used in both. Finally, it is time to add in the comparison symbols, the null hypothesis always uses an equals sign so it therefore becomes:
: p= .78
The alternate hypothesis then needs to consider if the researchers claim that the new proportion is greater, fewer, or different. In this case it is greater as they think that the ownership is above 78%, so a greater than sign would be used and the final statement would be:
: p > .78