Answer:
30.3° is the answer mi amigo
Step-by-step explanation:
si señor
Answer:
30% probability that the ball taken from B is red.
Step-by-step explanation:
A probability is the number of desired outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes.
In this question:
Red ball from urn A:
3/6 = 1/2 probability of getting a red ball from urn A.
Then urn B will have 5 balls, 2 of which are red, so 2/5 probability of getting a red ball.
Blue ball from urn A:
3/6 = 1/2 probability of getting a blue ball from urn A.
Then urn B will have 5 balls, 1 of which is red, so 1/5 probability of getting a red ball.
Total:
3/10 = 0.3 = 30%.
30% probability that the ball taken from B is red.
Answer:
The height above sea level at <em>B</em> is approximately 1,604.25 m
Step-by-step explanation:
The given length of the mountain railway, AB = 864 m
The angle at which the railway rises to the horizontal, θ = 120°
The elevation of the train above sea level at <em>A</em>, h₁ = 856 m
The height above sea level of the train when it reaches <em>B</em>, h₂, is found as follows;
Change in height across the railway, Δh = AB × sin(θ)
∴ Δh = 864 m × sin(120°) ≈ 748.25 m
Δh = h₂ - h₁
h₂ = Δh + h₁
∴ h₂ ≈ 856 m + 748.25 m = 1,604.25 m
The height above sea level of the train when it reaches <em>B</em> ≈ 1,604.25 m
Answer:
Take the root of both sides and solve.
f
=
9 and −
9
Step-by-step explanation:
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
