1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
12

Is the following number rational or irrational? - 13/12 A: rational B: irrational

Mathematics
2 answers:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<em>B</em><em>. </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>irrational</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

-13/12 = −1.083333333

Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
3 0
B irrational beacause they don’t have equal factors
You might be interested in
9
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

oa

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Identify the square root of 2 as either rational or irrational, and approximate to the tenths place
Pie

Answer: Irrational

Step-by-step explanation:

It is irrational because you cannot multiply a number by the same number to get the square root of 2.

I think the approximation is 1.4 or 1.42

6 0
3 years ago
According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 331 of 502 randomly selected U.S. adults interviewed said they would not be bother
k0ka [10]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.659 -0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{502}}}=7.124  

p_v =P(z>7.124)=5.24x10^{-13}  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.5.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=502 represent the random sample taken

X=331 represent the adults that said they would not be bothered if the NAtional security agency

\hat p=\frac{331}{502}=0.659 estimated proportion of people who would not be bothered if the NAtional security agency

p_o=0.5 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.01 represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is higher than the majority of 0.5:  

Null hypothesis:p\leq 0.5  

Alternative hypothesis:p > 0.5  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.659 -0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1-0.5)}{502}}}=7.124  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.01. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z>7.124)=5.24x10^{-13}  

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of interest is significantly higher than 0.5.  

4 0
3 years ago
Leah is paid semimonthly. How many fewer paychecks does she
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

Leah has 80 less paychecks than the weekly person.

Step-by-step explanation:

Leah is getting 24 paychecks in 2 years, Weekly person gets 104 paychecks in 2 years, 104 - 24 = 80 paychecks.

8 0
4 years ago
Math questionnnnn thanks if you helop
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

Replace X with 2

Evaluate the function. g(x) = 3x^2 – 2x + 5 Find f(2)​

g(x) = 3(2)^2 – 2(2) + 5

Next conduct PEMDAS

Exponents are first so solve 2^2 which is 2 x 2 = 4

g(x) = 3(4) – 2(2) + 5

Next step is multiplication multiply 3 x 4 and 2x2

g(x) = 12 – 4 + 5

conduct adding and subtracting left from right

g(x) = 13

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John and Jim painted a
    5·1 answer
  • The manager of a grocery store wants to determine the average amount of money spent at his store as it compares to the average d
    14·1 answer
  • The function g(x)=(x-2^2. The function f(x)=g(x) +3
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me ill give brainiest
    15·1 answer
  • Complete the tables of value for f(x) and g(x)
    9·1 answer
  • The drama club is selling candles for a fundraiser. They spend $100 on the candles and sell them for $4.50 each. How many candle
    12·2 answers
  • The table below represents a proportional relationship. The unit rate of the relationship is
    10·1 answer
  • Write a proportion to answer the question.
    14·1 answer
  • William fills 1/3 of a water bottle in 1/9 of a minute. How much time will it take him to fill the bottle
    11·2 answers
  • Amy bakes &amp; cakes.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!